Local Plan: Space for a site for travellers must be identified in Calderdale, planning inspector tells council
and live on Freeview channel 276
Calderdale does not have an official site and councillors heard Local Plan inspector, Katie Child, has asked the council to commit to submitting a development plan document on gypsy and traveller sites within one year of the plan being adopted.
This will be for permanent and transit sites and will also set out specific site allocations, Place Scrutiny Board councillors heard.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdAn assessment of need will include interviews with community members.
Planning lead Richard Seaman said in planning terms there are similarities with the process for selecting sites for the settled population. The assessment will form the baseline against which informed decisions would be taken thereafter.
Board Chair Coun Regan Dickenson (Con, Rastrick) asked why the council had not been looking for traveller sites as the draft Local Plan – awaiting the inspector’s decision – was being developed, and where they might actually be.
“We can expect there would be strong local objections to this,” he said.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdMr Seaman said need, and whether transitory or permanent, had to be identified before sites were identified.
The council would look at land it owned itself or there might be a “call for sites” approach if anyone had land they wished to sell and which could be used, issues ranging from air quality to schools being a factor.
“There are a lot of levels of screening you would need to go through to identify a suitable piece of land,” said Mr Seaman.
Sites where stopping was tolerated would also be explored, said Public Health Director Deborah Harkins, who had spoken about inequalities and discrimination travelling communities often faced.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdCoun Dickenson said it was a more complex picture than expected.
Coun Dave Young (Lab, Calder) said it would be truthful to say where sites were concerned that all councillors would be thinking “not in my ward” because all knew objections would be “overpowering”.
Councillors had heard the council should engage with them to assess what the traveller community’s needs were while also ensuring effective enforcement on illegal encampments.